Litigation is an economic liability for smoking-permitted gaming venues

from: Economic facts of smokefree gaming

by Regina Carlson, Executive Director
3 February 2006

Courts in the U.S. and around the world are increasingly issuing decisions to protect nonsmokers from secondhand smoke and to award damages to injured nonsmokers. Plaintiffs who are winning in these suits include employees, patrons, tenants, even prisoners. One of the first such cases was in New Jersey, Shimp vs. NJ Bell (1976), in which an employee won a permanent injunction guaranteeing her a smokefree workplace.

Casino workers who brought a class action lawsuit against the Kenner casino in Louisiana in 2002 recently won a $2.6 million settlement. Several Canadian employees have won lawsuits against casinos because of secondhand smoke in their work environment, and an employee of Napoleon's Casino in London settled for almost $100,000 in 2004.

Lawsuits filed by patrons, including claims under the ADA, were a factor in the creation of smokefree policies by major U.S. chain restaurants.

Employers and proprietors of public places often say they would never ignore a loose carpet in their facility or serve a drink in a chipped glass. Yet proprietors of smoking-permitted gaming sites are knowingly exposing employees and patrons to air polluted with a Class A carcinogen.

This page updated November 9, 2006